The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Note: This report is available in its entirety in PDF Format.
The text below is a portion of the complete document.
Executive Summary
The Assessing the New Federalism (ANF) project of the Urban Institute and its partner, Child
Trends, analyzed the experiences of low-income families and children over the past decade
during major shifts in the nation’s social welfare policies. The cornerstone of the ANF project
was the National Survey of America’s Families (NSAF), a survey of the economic, health, and
social characteristics of children, adults under the age of 65, and their families.
The NSAF charted new territory by asking new questions, devising new methods of
collecting data, and developing advanced estimating techniques. Over the course of a decade,
NSAF data has generated nearly 500 ANF publications, plus dozens of journal articles, book
chapters, research presentations, and many published and unpublished analyses by public users
of the data. The $40 million spent to conduct three rounds of the survey marked an unusual
commitment of more than a dozen private philanthropic resources to a large survey and proved
an efficient use of funds. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, by comparison, spent $36 million in
2002 to conduct one year of the Current Population Survey (CPS).
This report summarizes the pioneering steps and major accomplishments of the
methodology used to complete the NSAF, while identifying key challenges and important
lessons for future household surveys. This report aims to present this information so audiences
with a range of perspectives—including survey designers, researchers and academics, funders,
and policymakers—may draw new insights in survey techniques from the NSAF experiences.
Conducted in three rounds—1997, 1999, and 2002—to gather information on more than
100,000 people and more than 40,000 families across the country, the NSAF gives researchers
the tools to track national trends during that period, drawing on unusually detailed and
comprehensive information about low-income parents and their children. In addition, the NSAF
provided significant samples in 13 states with a broad range of fiscal capacity, indicators of child
well-being, and approaches to government programs. Using the NSAF, a researcher can compare
outcomes for low-income families living in states with very different circumstances and policies.
State snapshots were not possible before 1997, since other major national household
samples—such as the Current Population Survey—were not state-representative. While the CPS
and the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) had large representative samples, neither met
the project's needs because of limitations on content and the sample size of low-income families.
Future major surveys intended to inform low-income policy should build on what the
NSAF taught those most closely involved in its design, implementation, and analysis. Close
collaboration between policy and survey design experts proved essential, as did having flexibility
to experiment when designing the best ways to enhance survey response. Both strategies work
especially well in a multi-wave study like the NSAF, which offers the opportunity to learn from
the experience of one wave to design the next. Specific to NSAF, both strategies were enhanced
by the absence of procedural barriers and by the flexibility of a nongovernment survey.
However, both lessons could be modified for a government setting.
Note: This report is available in its entirety in PDF Format.
The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:
Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.
Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.
If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.