urban institute nonprofit social and economic policy research

Comment on "Helping Poor Working Parents Get Ahead"

Publication Date: July 16, 2008
Other Availability:
PDF | PrintPrinter-friendly summary
Permanent Link:
http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=411723
Share:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Yahoo Buzz Share on Digg Share on Reddit
| Email this pageEmail this page

The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the entire comment in PDF format.


This paper is a response to New Safety Net Paper 4, "Helping Poor Working Parents Get Ahead: Federal Funds for New State Strategies and Systems" by Harry J. Holzer and Karin Martinson.


Harry Holzer and Karin Martinson propose to spend up to $5 billion a year of new federal money on creating “state-level advancement systems” to promote higher skills and earnings among low-income working parents. I find their proposals attractive but premature. I would rather spend new money first on promoting higher work levels among these adults and on developing better programs. The time for a new advancement system will come, but not right away.

In table 1 of “Helping Poor Working Parents Get Ahead,” Holzer and Martinson show that higher incomes are strongly associated with higher educational levels. Incomes are even more strongly linked, however, simply to higher work levels. Among adults age 16 and older with incomes under the poverty level, only 37 percent claimed any earnings at all in 2006, and only 12 percent worked full time year-round. Even among those with incomes under 200 percent of the poverty level, only 47 percent worked at all, and only 24 percent full time year-round. For the population as a whole, the equivalent figures were 68 and 46 percent. For heads of family with children living under the poverty level, only 54 percent worked, 22 percent full time year-round. Looking at heads of families with incomes under 200 percent of the poverty level, the comparable figures were 69 and 41 percent. Among the U.S. population, they were 83 and 62 percent.1 For the low-income group to work at levels typical of the population would do more to raise family income than anything else.

(End of excerpt. The entire comment is available in PDF format.)


Topics/Tags: | Employment | Families and Parenting | Poverty and Safety Net


The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

Usage, posting and reprint of materials on the UI web site:

Most publications may be downloaded free of charge from the web site in PDF format. This information may be used and copies made for research, academic, policy or other non-commercial purposes. Proper attribution is required.

Copyright of the written materials contained within the Urban Institute website is owned or controlled by the Urban Institute. Posting UI research papers on other websites is permitted subject to prior approval from the Urban Institute—contact paffairs@urban.org.

If you are unable to access or print the PDF document please contact us or call the Publications Office at (202) 261-5687.

Email this Page